First Monday, an online, peer-reviewed journal, published the article - The Augmented Social Network: building identity and trust into the next-generation Internet by Ken Jordan, Jan Hauser, and Steven Foster.
The
authors describe the future of the internet as an evolution from online
experimentation and fads to stabilizing trends creating reliability,
trust, even dependence. They view social linkages as far more than a
passing phenomenon. They predict the ability of citizens to form
relationships and self-organize around shared interests in communities
of practice in order to better engage in online citizenship.
They propose an Augmented Social Network
(ASN) model that facilitates connections between online communities and
even builds into Internet architecture the role identity brokers could
play. The authors note several elements of an ASN including:
Persistent Identity.
Enabling individuals online to maintain a persistent identity as they
move between different Internet communities, and to have personal
control over that identity. This identity should be capable of
reflecting an endless variety of interests, needs, desires, and
relationships.
Interoperability Between Online Communities.
People should be able to cross easily between online communities under
narrowly defined circumstances, just as in life we can move from one
social network to another.
Brokered Relationships.
Using databased information, online brokers (both automated and "live")
should be able to facilitate the introduction between people who share
affinities and/or complementary capabilities and are seeking to make
connections. Such a system of brokered relationships should also enable
people to find other individuals, information or media that is of
interest to them, through the recommendations of trusted third parties.
The surprising thing is that this abstract was published back in July, 2003. Only 5 years later, and here we are.
My Facebook
tells me I should add you as a friend. Why? It knows who we share in
common. Let me search you and verify your established online
presence. Now I can add you to my Plaxo, LinkedIn and twitter
contacts. This means I get to find out who you're connected to, see
your work history, and probably hear what you ate for breakfast today
via tweet.
Because
building community is essential for the Church, we can capitalize on
social networking. In fact, isn't one of our primary goals to seek out
those in need of spiritual hope and initiate relationship with them?
Since we know the Good News is most commonly transmitted
person-to-person, it's not hard to see how the social web provides a unique new forum for sharing our faith.
The
relational trust individuals share paves the way for those with
spiritual hope, healing and health to link with those they find in
their circle of trusted others. Equally importantly, it allows
buildable bridges & connections with those a degree or more away. Quite
obviously, we can not try to impose our beliefs on a whole society, but
individually we can be witnesses of Jesus Christ, communicating with
people of other faiths (or no faith) via the linkages we have online.
While some criticize the masks people wear online (persistent pseuds), view online communications as "not real" or reflect on the fragilty of social networking
(all important considerations by the way) many Christians are engaging
in conversations, networking and even collaborating with individuals
they might never get a chance to communicate with face-to-face. I say
it's an opportunity. What's your take on online social networking?
-- Cynthia Ware - The Digital Sanctuary
Recent Comments