First Monday, an online, peer-reviewed journal, published the article - The Augmented Social Network: building identity and trust into the next-generation Internet by Ken Jordan, Jan Hauser, and Steven Foster.
The authors describe the future of the internet as an evolution from online experimentation and fads to stabilizing trends creating reliability, trust, even dependence. They view social linkages as far more than a passing phenomenon. They predict the ability of citizens to form relationships and self-organize around shared interests in communities of practice in order to better engage in online citizenship.
They propose an Augmented Social Network (ASN) model that facilitates connections between online communities and even builds into Internet architecture the role identity brokers could play. The authors note several elements of an ASN including:
Persistent Identity. Enabling individuals online to maintain a persistent identity as they move between different Internet communities, and to have personal control over that identity. This identity should be capable of reflecting an endless variety of interests, needs, desires, and relationships.
Interoperability Between Online Communities. People should be able to cross easily between online communities under narrowly defined circumstances, just as in life we can move from one social network to another.
Brokered Relationships. Using databased information, online brokers (both automated and "live") should be able to facilitate the introduction between people who share affinities and/or complementary capabilities and are seeking to make connections. Such a system of brokered relationships should also enable people to find other individuals, information or media that is of interest to them, through the recommendations of trusted third parties.
The surprising thing is that this abstract was published back in July, 2003. Only 5 years later, and here we are.
My Facebook tells me I should add you as a friend. Why? It knows who we share in common. Let me search you and verify your established online presence. Now I can add you to my Plaxo, LinkedIn and twitter contacts. This means I get to find out who you're connected to, see your work history, and probably hear what you ate for breakfast today via tweet.
Because building community is essential for the Church, we can capitalize on social networking. In fact, isn't one of our primary goals to seek out those in need of spiritual hope and initiate relationship with them? Since we know the Good News is most commonly transmitted person-to-person, it's not hard to see how the social web provides a unique new forum for sharing our faith.
The relational trust individuals share paves the way for those with spiritual hope, healing and health to link with those they find in their circle of trusted others. Equally importantly, it allows buildable bridges & connections with those a degree or more away. Quite obviously, we can not try to impose our beliefs on a whole society, but individually we can be witnesses of Jesus Christ, communicating with people of other faiths (or no faith) via the linkages we have online.
While some criticize the masks people wear online (persistent pseuds), view online communications as "not real" or reflect on the fragilty of social networking (all important considerations by the way) many Christians are engaging in conversations, networking and even collaborating with individuals they might never get a chance to communicate with face-to-face. I say it's an opportunity. What's your take on online social networking?
-- Cynthia Ware - The Digital Sanctuary
Comments